西方四个国家的24名专家主张韩“天安”证据是造假
由美国、澳大利亚、英国、瑞典四个国家的24名专家参加的调出指出：
韩国所说的北朝鲜CHT-02D型鱼雷设计图和物证鱼雷是完全不同的另一种鱼雷，而且，没有专家的签名
2010/05/24/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-we-are-being-lied-to/The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied ToPosted on May 24, 2010 by willylomanby Scott CreightonThat’s it. That’s all their “evidence” that the international investigators presented in their UNSIGNED report. That’s right, no on-e knows who the “investigators” were since they didn’t take the time to sign their work.
A Perfect Match?
This is the presentation refered to in the paper linked above. They mention that during a presentation of their findings, they showed the schematics of a CHT-02D torpedo in relation to the evidence they found. They claimed in their investigation that these are a “perfect match” and that claim is being repeated endlessly on both sides of the fake political divide. (please click on image for a larger view)This is by no means a “perfect match”. No wonder they didn’t want to sign that “investigation” of theirs. (please click on image for a larger view)There are 4 clear differences in the design of these weapons and on-e is without a doubt, the key to proving these are not the same.
* “A” & “D” – Here you can clearly see major differences in the design of the hub of the propellers. In the diagram above you can see it has a smaller hub whereas in the evidence below it, the hub is larger.
* “B” – The actual shape of the propellers is very different. You can see a notch in the diagram above that doesn’t exist in the actual evidence propeller below. The overall shape of the blades are vastly different as well, both the front and the rear propeller sets.
All of this might be explained away by suggesting that these propellers were switched out. Thought it might be possible, remember that these are finely tuned and designed systems; on-e just can’t switch these hub designs “willy nilly” like on-e would on their John-Boat. But, that aside, though it may be possible to have put different kinds of propellers on this fish, it is certainly NOT a “perfect match”.
Now, the last point proves they are not the same torpedo.
* “C” - As you can plainly see, the stabilizers (or propulsion system?) in the diagram above are clearly shown IN FRONT of the separation plate as it is lined up in the display with the evidence below. However, the torpedo below houses that same stabilizer (or propulsion system) BEHIND the separation plate (separating the body and the tail section of the torpedo).
This is a major difference that cannot be explained by saying it was some kind of after market modification. This is part of a key design of the workings of these weapons and can not have been changed. This difference clearly indicates these are different weapons altogether.
(there are other differences that have been pointed out to this researcher; “Jan” noticed that the axle shape is tapered on the evidence and straight on the diagram. A good point. There are probably others as well (I noticed a difference in the shape of the “fin” in the guidance section in the back as well…. clearly there is no way to say these are a “perfect match”)It is no wonder the “investigators” chose not to sign their work.
ConclusionIt is clear that we are being lied to and manipulated into believing that North Korea is behind the sinking of the South Korean vessel, the Cheonan. It is impossible to draw conclusions at this time as to who is responsible but we can conclude based on the evidence, that the official story is yet another lie being pawned off on the American people. This lie is obvious and could be used to instigate military action against the people of North Korea.
[ 本帖最后由 lookmy 于 2010-5-30 11:19 编辑 ]
